The United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union in 2020 marked a significant shift in its environmental governance, reshaping laws, regulatory frameworks, and enforcement practices developed under EU oversight. For decades, EU membership provided the UK with a structured approach to environmental protection, guided by comprehensive policies on biodiversity, air, and water quality, waste management, and climate action. These frameworks were enforced by EU institutions, which held member states accountable to high environmental standards. Brexit, however, unravelled this interconnected system, placing the responsibility for environmental regulation and enforcement squarely back with the UK government.
Prior to Brexit, UK environmental law was intertwined with EU regulations, which provided consistent guidelines across all member states. The EU's body of environmental law — commonly referred to as the “acquis” — covered diverse areas, including air quality, water quality, biodiversity protection and climate action. These EU directives required member states to implement legislation that met minimum standards while the ECJ served as the enforcement mechanism, penalising states that failed to uphold environmental obligations. Now facing the challenge of independently shaping its environmental policies, the UK must address growing concerns about regulatory gaps, weakened oversight and potential divergence from EU standards. This shift has had immediate and long-term implications for the country’s natural landscapes, biodiversity and climate commitments.
One of the most pressing concerns post-Brexit is regulatory divergence. In some instances, the UK has adopted lower standards than the EU, such as the re-approval of neonicotinoid pesticides in 2021. Although the EU banned these pesticides in 2013 due to their harmful impact on pollinators, the UK granted temporary exemptions for specific agricultural purposes. This decision has been called “environmentally regressive” and has led to strong opposition from environmental groups and scientists who warn that continued pesticide use could lead to long-term declines in bee populations and other pollinators that are essential for biodiversity and agriculture.
Organisations such as Friends of the Earth and the Wildlife Trusts argue that the exemption sets a precedent that undermines previous efforts to protect ecosystems and pollinator health. Beyond biodiversity concerns, there are fears that this decision reflects a broader inclination to lower standards in ways that prioritise short-term economic benefits over sustainable environmental practices. Some critics argue that the UK’s willingness to diverge from EU pesticide standards may signal future regulatory decisions that could compromise the integrity of air and water quality protections.
An analysis by the Guardian revealed that the UK is falling behind the EU in almost every area of environmental regulation, destroyed in a post-Brexit departure from the EU. Government ministers eradicating EU environmental protections in some cases affect not only the wider UK ecosystem but also the general population as a whole. This divergence leaves the UK open to greater environmental degradation and public health impacts, especially if large UK businesses face fewer regulatory checks than their EU counterparts.
Brexit has also affected climate-related commitments. Although the UK government has pledged to maintain high standards, some worry that post-Brexit policies prioritise economic flexibility over environmental resilience. The Environment Act 2021, introduced to address these gaps, includes legally-binding targets for air pollution, but it has been criticised for its insufficient ambition, especially concerning particulate matter (PM2.5) limits, which lag behind World Health Organisation recommendations. Environmental advocates argue that these delays and weaker targets will prolong the public’s exposure to harmful pollutants.
As the UK nears its third year post-Brexit, the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill represents a significant threat to environmental protections rooted in EU standards. This bill, introduced in 2022, gives ministers powers to modify thousands of retained EU laws by the end of 2023, with the deadline for revisions extended to 2026. This “sunsetting” process could lead to the removal of essential environmental regulations covering everything from biodiversity protections and water quality standards to air pollution limits and waste management controls. Without careful legislative oversight, the bill could dismantle critical policies that have underpinned UK environmental law for decades.
The Bill also raises serious concerns about the consistency of environmental protections across the UK’s devolved administrations. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have aligned more closely with EU environmental standards and have voiced opposition to the deregulation or weakening of these standards. If the UK government unilaterally amends or repeals these environmental laws, it could result in a fragmented approach to environmental protection. Varying levels of enforcement across the nations could create regulatory loopholes that make it difficult to maintain cohesive national policies on climate action, pollution control and conservation. The cumulative impact of these changes suggests that, in the absence of the EU’s structured enforcement, the UK risks backsliding on crucial environmental achievements. This shift could lead to a dirtier environment, compromised water quality and biodiversity loss, affecting both ecosystems and public health.
On July 4, 2024, the UK witnessed a major political shift with Labour's victory in the national election, marking the party's first win after 14 years of Conservative governments. This transition has had a notable transformation in the country's environmental policy direction: the new Labour government's environmental policies reflect a decisive shift compared to the previous Conservative administration's approach, particularly regarding climate action and green energy. The Labour agenda emphasises achieving net zero carbon emissions for the power sector by 2030—five years earlier than the Conservatives' 2035 target. Labour plans to enhance renewable energy capacity significantly, aiming to double onshore wind, triple solar power, and quadruple offshore wind capacity by 2030. It also seeks to strengthen investment in hydrogen, nuclear energy, and carbon capture, contrasting with the Conservative approach, which maintained a more gradual transition and permitted new fossil fuel exploration under specific conditions.
Image by MasterTux via Wikimedia Commons