In 2024, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity in the United States continues to be a contentious issue as corporations navigate an increasingly complex regulatory landscape. JPMorgan's Chief Executive Officer, Jamie Dimon, has expressed concerns regarding the growing regulatory obstacles, prompting a broader debate over whether the U.S. is evolving into an ‘anti-M&A’ jurisdiction.
A Moderate Rebound in M&A Activity
Despite mounting regulatory concerns, the global M&A market has exhibited moderate signs of recovery. For the first time, dealmakers have access to a statistically reliable gauge of market sentiment through the M&A Sentiment Index, newly introduced by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG). This index offers monthly updates on the willingness of market participants to engage in mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures.
As of early 2024, the Index stands at 78, which falls below the ten-year average of 100. This sentiment suggests that caution still permeates the market, though it reflects improvement from a low of 62 in November 2023. However, while global M&A activity in the first half of 2024 reached $1 trillion, this figure still lags behind the ten-year average of $1.5 trillion.
In terms of geographical distribution, the United States has maintained a dominant position, accounting for 61% of global M&A transactions. Approximately $631 billion in deals involving North American targets have been executed, representing a 14% increase over the previous year.
Yet, this uptick has not been uniform across all sectors. Industries such as healthcare and industrials have witnessed notable declines in deal volume. Furthermore, megadeals — those exceeding $10 billion in value — have declined starkly. Only four such transactions were announced in the second quarter of 2024, a significant drop from the quarterly average of nine megadeals over the past decade.
Regulatory Pressure on U.S. M&A
The U.S. banking sector has been particularly impacted by regulatory developments, with Jamie Dimon prominently voicing concerns over the increasing hurdles posed by federal regulators. Fitch Ratings reports that heightened regulatory oversight has impeded consolidation efforts, especially for banks with assets exceeding $50 billion. Institutions surpassing this threshold face intensified scrutiny, often resulting in significant delays or outright denials of merger approvals.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) have proposed new rules aimed at complicating the merger approval process for mid-sized and large financial institutions.
Notably, the OCC’s recent Notice of Proposed Rulemaking discourages transactions that would result in a single institution holding more than $50 billion in assets. Simultaneously, the Department of Justice (DoJ) has updated its merger guidelines to expand the scope of antitrust considerations beyond traditional competition metrics. This shift makes it increasingly likely that mergers will be blocked on anti-competitive grounds, adding complexity to M&A negotiations across sectors.
Dimon has emphasised that these regulatory changes present significant challenges for dealmakers, particularly within the financial services sector. He further notes that regulatory reviews can now stretch over 18 to 24 months, a delay that leaves firms exposed to heightened risks throughout the process.
Dimon argues that the consolidation of mid-sized banks would create "safer and sounder" financial institutions by allowing them to achieve economies of scale. He contends that restricting such mergers stifles competition, contrary to the objectives of antitrust regulation. However, despite these criticisms, the regulatory environment continues to make it difficult for banks to execute transformative mergers, resulting in a more subdued M&A landscape.
Broader M&A Challenges in the United States
While the banking sector is emblematic of the broader challenges facing M&A activity in the United States, similar obstacles persist across other industries. The M&A Sentiment Index reflects this mixed outlook, with dealmakers expressing concerns about the risks posed by regulatory delays, economic uncertainty, and geopolitical volatility.
Moreover, the federal government’s increasing focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) compliance, national security issues, and data protection has introduced further layers of complexity into the M&A process. This elevated regulatory scrutiny is not limited to the financial sector but extends to industries such as telecommunications, media, and technology, where significant M&A gains have been tempered by regulatory intervention.
Fitch Ratings has noted that U.S. regulators have adopted a more cautious approach to M&A than their European counterparts, where dealmaking has been more robust. Similarly, BCG’s M&A Sentiment Index indicates a more optimistic outlook for dealmaking in Europe, as well as in sectors such as energy, materials, and technology. These disparities reinforce the perception that the U.S. is becoming increasingly resistant to large-scale M&A transactions, particularly those involving significant consolidation of market power.
A Restrictive Landscape
Although the U.S. M&A market remains active, the current regulatory climate has prompted many to argue that the country is moving toward a more anti-M&A stance, especially within the banking sector. The combination of stricter regulatory reviews, prolonged approval timelines, and expanded antitrust guidelines has rendered the M&A process more complex and fraught with risk.
As Dimon has observed, this regulatory caution may inadvertently limit competition, the very objective that it seeks to promote. Moving forward, the trajectory of M&A in the United States will likely depend on whether regulatory bodies reconsider their current stance in response to industry concerns. For the time being, however, the U.S. appears to be embracing a more restrictive approach to corporate consolidation, particularly in sectors characterised by significant market concentration.
Image by King of Hearts via Wikimedia Commons